back to floor wall ceiling

Back to the good old floor wall ceiling theory that I claimed is important in solving many age old questions.

Review:

Everything could literally or abstractly be classified as having a "floor", a "wall" and a "ceiling".
 The ceiling could be the literal highest point, or the leading figure.
The wall could be the middle component, or the majority, or the middle class.
The floor could be the bottom most part , or the lowest category.
I mentioned examples of how countries and then moved on to it being a more grandiose concept where God is the "ceiling"..etc.

I also want to say something else that I failed to mention before. Everything is also made up of two things/there are two things of everything.

This will be important later.

For now lets continue arguing for the purpose of life by using the same argument mentioned in the blog before last.

Someone knocks at the door, you need to ask him/her a questions so s/he can prove to you via his/her logical answers that s/he is telling the truth (and not by your knowledge because you have none. Only assumptions).
 
The ceiling here is the commander and rest is what is controlled, not a literal ceiling that is being held by the other components and there being a mutual dependency. If the ceiling were to create everything else, then it must logically be complete without the other things. It would not need the other things, but at least created them to fulfill some purpose. If there was a need then the ceiling wouldn't make free will. The ceiling would make logically make the most efficient creation that would suit the purpose it was made for.

Now another good point: when asking the person at the door who they are, you ask them to prove who they are based on first asking directly, then testing the answers that pertain to who they are. For example:
you: who are you?
door person: I am bob (person that you know)

you: well then if you really are bob then what did you say to me that one time on that one day when we were alone at this hour?
if
bob: I said (false answer)
then
you: you are not bob.
in which case if bob is desperate to prove his point
bob: I meant (something else), or i couldn't remember exactly, how about (new question).

and


if bob: I said (correct answer)
then
you: ok fine
or
you: what about that other time when (new question)

This is now the simplest way to find out who is at the door (the unseen). This does not pertain to the nature of the purpose that the ceiling created everything else for. This is just to varify if the ceiling truly is the creator (which by definition he is). So the system does not have to be fair to the creation.

Lets just say that the ceiling has made a fair (extremely complex) universe and made it have laws that he knows and can obviously alter at will. The complexity of the universe and the low intellect of the creation and their sometimes irrational emotions could lead to the seeming unfairness of the system. (More on that specifically in the future isa).

Would it only make sense to tell the creation without a shadow of a doubt that the ceiling created them (if they have cognition). It just so happens that it is in people's nature to be curious, especially about this topic. And it just so happens that every culture and civilization believed in a system where they worshiped a higher power. So one could say that it is the natural thing to do. It is programmed in us to know of the creator. It is logical to do so. Now what isn't logical is what some people do. Some humans (now most) are capable of thought and allow for arrogance or laziness (and other things, but mainly those two) to get the best of them and cloud their natural awareness.

I will need to talk about these evidences eventually, but I just wanted to make a solid foundation based on logic on how things are. Stay tuned for more.

purpose of life cont.

its been a long time guys, i've missed you

alright so i know a lot of you guys have finals, but i had a few minutes of free time due to my designer's block (similar to a writer's block) and i am just taking a mini break and hopefully isa i get into it again after this.

so as i recall correctly i was talking about the validity of life having a purpose.

One of my points is that for life to be fair, it needs to have a system of retribution after life is over. This is necessary because a lot of injustice happens and if there isnt a system then life isnt fair.

Also for that or any system to exist (especially one with this immense level of complexity) there needs to be a purpose. Then for this life to be fair according to said purposeful system the rules need to be told to the creation to do their purpose they were created for towards the creator.

Also the reason for a creator needing to exist in the first place is because our laws, rules, and theories do not adequately explain how we arrived in the here and now (and I am ready to discuss in great depths, in depth or in public every one).

Before I get into what I believe in, and why, lets talk about this quick example.

If someone knocks at the door of your appartment, and there are many people with you inside. Everyone would probably start to argue and debate who is outside, and what do they want.

The first logical thing to do is to observe and or ask who it is depending on what is available. They would tell you who they are and what they want, then you would ask them more questions to varify logically if they are telling the truth based on what you know.

Equate this to a book, or a person that claims to tell you the answer to who is knocking. You would not tell the person knocking on the door that you know more about them than they do, you would say I don't believe you because what you are telling me is inconsistent with things I know are universal facts/valid logic.

So If someone were to argue with you about the purpose of life, you would defend it according to the validity of their arguments and not your own knowledge. As is the case with the person at the door, you know nothing about them, you can not see, hear, nor feel evidence of your purpose or how you came to exist.

Next are more points to consider before going forward with more