Back to the good old floor wall ceiling theory that I claimed is important in solving many age old questions.
Review:
Everything could literally or abstractly be classified as having a "floor", a "wall" and a "ceiling".
The ceiling could be the literal highest point, or the leading figure.
The wall could be the middle component, or the majority, or the middle class.
The floor could be the bottom most part , or the lowest category.
I mentioned examples of how countries and then moved on to it being a more grandiose concept where God is the "ceiling"..etc.
I also want to say something else that I failed to mention before. Everything is also made up of two things/there are two things of everything.
This will be important later.
For now lets continue arguing for the purpose of life by using the same argument mentioned in the blog before last.
Someone knocks at the door, you need to ask him/her a questions so s/he can prove to you via his/her logical answers that s/he is telling the truth (and not by your knowledge because you have none. Only assumptions).
The ceiling here is the commander and rest is what is controlled, not a literal ceiling that is being held by the other components and there being a mutual dependency. If the ceiling were to create everything else, then it must logically be complete without the other things. It would not need the other things, but at least created them to fulfill some purpose. If there was a need then the ceiling wouldn't make free will. The ceiling would make logically make the most efficient creation that would suit the purpose it was made for.
Now another good point: when asking the person at the door who they are, you ask them to prove who they are based on first asking directly, then testing the answers that pertain to who they are. For example:
you: who are you?
door person: I am bob (person that you know)
you: well then if you really are bob then what did you say to me that one time on that one day when we were alone at this hour?
if
bob: I said (false answer)
then
you: you are not bob.
in which case if bob is desperate to prove his point
bob: I meant (something else), or i couldn't remember exactly, how about (new question).
and
if bob: I said (correct answer)
then
you: ok fine
or
you: what about that other time when (new question)
This is now the simplest way to find out who is at the door (the unseen). This does not pertain to the nature of the purpose that the ceiling created everything else for. This is just to varify if the ceiling truly is the creator (which by definition he is). So the system does not have to be fair to the creation.
Lets just say that the ceiling has made a fair (extremely complex) universe and made it have laws that he knows and can obviously alter at will. The complexity of the universe and the low intellect of the creation and their sometimes irrational emotions could lead to the seeming unfairness of the system. (More on that specifically in the future isa).
Would it only make sense to tell the creation without a shadow of a doubt that the ceiling created them (if they have cognition). It just so happens that it is in people's nature to be curious, especially about this topic. And it just so happens that every culture and civilization believed in a system where they worshiped a higher power. So one could say that it is the natural thing to do. It is programmed in us to know of the creator. It is logical to do so. Now what isn't logical is what some people do. Some humans (now most) are capable of thought and allow for arrogance or laziness (and other things, but mainly those two) to get the best of them and cloud their natural awareness.
I will need to talk about these evidences eventually, but I just wanted to make a solid foundation based on logic on how things are. Stay tuned for more.
Review:
Everything could literally or abstractly be classified as having a "floor", a "wall" and a "ceiling".
The ceiling could be the literal highest point, or the leading figure.
The wall could be the middle component, or the majority, or the middle class.
The floor could be the bottom most part , or the lowest category.
I mentioned examples of how countries and then moved on to it being a more grandiose concept where God is the "ceiling"..etc.
I also want to say something else that I failed to mention before. Everything is also made up of two things/there are two things of everything.
This will be important later.
For now lets continue arguing for the purpose of life by using the same argument mentioned in the blog before last.
Someone knocks at the door, you need to ask him/her a questions so s/he can prove to you via his/her logical answers that s/he is telling the truth (and not by your knowledge because you have none. Only assumptions).
The ceiling here is the commander and rest is what is controlled, not a literal ceiling that is being held by the other components and there being a mutual dependency. If the ceiling were to create everything else, then it must logically be complete without the other things. It would not need the other things, but at least created them to fulfill some purpose. If there was a need then the ceiling wouldn't make free will. The ceiling would make logically make the most efficient creation that would suit the purpose it was made for.
Now another good point: when asking the person at the door who they are, you ask them to prove who they are based on first asking directly, then testing the answers that pertain to who they are. For example:
you: who are you?
door person: I am bob (person that you know)
you: well then if you really are bob then what did you say to me that one time on that one day when we were alone at this hour?
if
bob: I said (false answer)
then
you: you are not bob.
in which case if bob is desperate to prove his point
bob: I meant (something else), or i couldn't remember exactly, how about (new question).
and
if bob: I said (correct answer)
then
you: ok fine
or
you: what about that other time when (new question)
This is now the simplest way to find out who is at the door (the unseen). This does not pertain to the nature of the purpose that the ceiling created everything else for. This is just to varify if the ceiling truly is the creator (which by definition he is). So the system does not have to be fair to the creation.
Lets just say that the ceiling has made a fair (extremely complex) universe and made it have laws that he knows and can obviously alter at will. The complexity of the universe and the low intellect of the creation and their sometimes irrational emotions could lead to the seeming unfairness of the system. (More on that specifically in the future isa).
Would it only make sense to tell the creation without a shadow of a doubt that the ceiling created them (if they have cognition). It just so happens that it is in people's nature to be curious, especially about this topic. And it just so happens that every culture and civilization believed in a system where they worshiped a higher power. So one could say that it is the natural thing to do. It is programmed in us to know of the creator. It is logical to do so. Now what isn't logical is what some people do. Some humans (now most) are capable of thought and allow for arrogance or laziness (and other things, but mainly those two) to get the best of them and cloud their natural awareness.
I will need to talk about these evidences eventually, but I just wanted to make a solid foundation based on logic on how things are. Stay tuned for more.
No comments:
Post a Comment